OBAMA OR ROMNEY
hokiefani already made the inverse to that argument, so it goes both ways. further proof that politics is garbage and we're all fucked.
hokiefanShouldn't a union have to work to earn the money from the workers, essentially a free enterprise, instead of forcing everyone to buy their product? What if I've worked a plant for 20 years and the union doesn't make a push for demands I want as an employee, fails to file grievances that i feel are necessary, why would I want to pay for that product.
Maybe you deal with the wrong union. Most unions bring together you and your co workers and negotiate for you. Not just salary and benefits but transfers, safety, education, pensions, vacations etc...you are not paying for nothing. If you feel your union isnt representing you adequately you can join a different union that you feels focuses on the things you want.
not in a closed shop you cant, i've been with this company 20 years, I don't want to just give up that tenure, I can't just go get another union. at least in a right to work state, I can make my vote against the union by dropping out, they need to earn my dues. i work hard in this shop, and my co-workers go around telling the new guys to slow down, not work too fast because it takes away the overtime on the weekends. they tell them not to learn too many positions because then the company is just going to force them to come in and work when they don't want to. I think that's a joke and I don't stand for it. I had a supervisor walk by and start helping to restack some parts that fell on the floor and our local shop steward got all up in arms and said he's gonna file a greivance because he's taking away our work, when the supervisor was just trying to help out the team.
what do i do?
Sounds like your problem deals with the individuals that your union let in not what the union is trying to do for the workers. I'm sure they are not training them to do and say that stuff. The wrong people can ruin any organization and make the system look flawed when in turn its the individuals envovled.
Just think of sports agents dealing with college players. Its up to the student athelete to police himself and know what's right and wrong. If he gets caught then he faces stiff penalties for the entire program.
To me it seems like you are not actually in the union but works along side some of them, is this true?
yeah so you try to manage out the bad apples and the union just brings them back through arbitration. what gives?
wormdogg10"The average cost of living-adjusted household income in SMSAs in Right to Work states
is $47,320. Average adjusted household income in SMSAs in forced-unionism states is
$46,507. In terms of what their money income can buy, families living in SMSAs in
Right to Work states are $813 better off than families living in SMSAs in forcedunionism states. This evidence refutes Organized Labor’s argument that families are
better off living in states without Right to Work laws."
http://nilrr.org/files/Poulson%20SOL%20Study.pdf
forced union states are primarily higher taxed, left leaning states.
That was in 2005 RTW states income are almost $5000 lower then union states wages. They are also more likely to have more than 1 job or areon govt assistance of some kind.
KROWNVICAre you in the union hokie?
]
You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those that can do nothing for him!you're right others can probably explain it better then me, maybe thats why there are unions ;]. All i see are many ill effects,not many positive in this.

wormdogg10No hes in management. And Ive been in management of unionized workers as well and basically the only thing that we ever had issues with was what my employees werent and were required to do. But never had any problems because we didnt hire idiots and the other people had been there for decades and knew how to do their jobs.
hokiefantime to call in a shop steward
hokiefanNo hes in management. And Ive been in management of unionized workers as well and basically the only thing that we ever had issues with was what my employees werent and were required to do. But never had any problems because we didnt hire idiots and the other people had been there for decades and knew how to do their jobs.
it's a tough issue because it varies so widely case by case. we dealt with a union crew that handled a mechanical and electrical install and they were stand up, very professional guys that did good work. I see the benefits definitely, but I also see the other side of it where there is intimidation and tactics that are used that are not in the benefit of employees who just want to go to work and do a good job.
KROWNVICNo hes in management. And Ive been in management of unionized workers as well and basically the only thing that we ever had issues with was what my employees werent and were required to do. But never had any problems because we didnt hire idiots and the other people had been there for decades and knew how to do their jobs.
I see...here in illinois they don't play like he described. If you can't pull your weight, you get walked off and they cut the check. When enough companies here bad things about your name then you don't ever get called out. The unions are not forced upon companies either but I "think" the ones that use them get benefits from tax cuts or gonerment contracts. So its a win win for both sides here.
]
You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those that can do nothing for him!sadly I think this is more about politics and less about economy, I guess in the long run we will see how it works out. The first decade hasnt worked so well for oklahoma it seems?


First
