Item Title

Item Description

OBAMA's 2nd TERM Discussion Thread

13 years ago  #781
Level 34
Status: offline
Gang: Disciples of Bino
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 10 months
Posts: 3,889

Originally posted by FAMOdick
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

its crazy how conservative u and shank really are !! , bet u guys make your dates leave the tip when u take them out to dinner , and rip your 2 ply ass wipe in half so you get double the usage !!

tips,dates??..dick,I gotta wife,family and mortgage and other obligations...ain't to many dates in years..but like hokie,I tip well..in fact this morning me and the wife went out for breakfast,and altho r waitress was horrible,the other wait staff was commendable and I knew they shared the tips..so we left 20%.

13 years ago  #782
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #783
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

definitely not doubting that there isn't good people out there, that legitimately need help. also not doubting that shit is tough for a lot of people. i think we agree that we both dislike the folks who freeload off the system. I work daily with folks who are working hard to get by, doing whatever they can do make ends meet for their family. but that's just the point, they are working hard to make ends meet and provide for their family. my only beef is with those not working hard, waiting in line for their next check and not wanting to go find work.

i am for the establishment of eligibility requirements to receive federal aid, to reign in the abuse and waste. for example, food stamps should be non-transferable, and only permitted on the same items as programs like WIC, basic healthy staples. drug screening should be there too, u want federal money, clean up your act. (or is that too hard? too much to ask?)

13 years ago  #784
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Since when do you talk like this? Yeah I's be libin it up like aum bich. Mack these hoes and shit!

GTFOH with that BS Hokkkie. You dont know me Im a grown ass man who works and pays bills and spend spend spend on my step daughters tuition in college. Do I buy myself things? Yeah. Why? Because I always have to look good, not only is it my job but its an investment. If I look good I get paid to make others look good. You Judgemental MF!

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #785
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

definitely not doubting that there isn't good people out there, that legitimately need help. also not doubting that shit is tough for a lot of people. i think we agree that we both dislike the folks who freeload off the system. I work daily with folks who are working hard to get by, doing whatever they can do make ends meet for their family. but that's just the point, they are working hard to make ends meet and provide for their family. my only beef is with those not working hard, waiting in line for their next check and not wanting to go find work.

i am for the establishment of eligibility requirements to receive federal aid, to reign in the abuse and waste. for example, food stamps should be non-transferable, and only permitted on the same items as programs like WIC, basic healthy staples. drug screening should be there too, u want federal money, clean up your act. (or is that too hard? too much to ask?)

See thats my whole point nobody is for freeloaders (except freeloaders). When I speak of people I dont speak of any of that shit. Just hard working people. WIC is a perfect example of a great benefit. It can only be used on healthy stuff for babies and toddlers. I agree drug screening should be there but that doesnt mean I dont agree assistance should be denied. I think the children may need to be removed in some cases and whom ever is taking care of them should get the assistance. My first thought is on the kids all the kids in the world should be able to eat.

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #786
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Since when do you talk like this? Yeah I's be libin it up like aum bich. Mack these hoes and shit!

GTFOH with that BS Hokkkie. You dont know me Im a grown ass man who works and pays bills and spend spend spend on my step daughters tuition in college. Do I buy myself things? Yeah. Why? Because I always have to look good, not only is it my job but its an investment. If I look good I get paid to make others look good. You Judgemental MF!

that's all good stuff man, I respect hard work. do you believe in the solvency of social security as it is today, with a declining workforce?

13 years ago  #787
Level 21
Status: offline
Gang: The Deplorables
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 7 months
Posts: 2,666

Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

definitely not doubting that there isn't good people out there, that legitimately need help. also not doubting that shit is tough for a lot of people. i think we agree that we both dislike the folks who freeload off the system. I work daily with folks who are working hard to get by, doing whatever they can do make ends meet for their family. but that's just the point, they are working hard to make ends meet and provide for their family. my only beef is with those not working hard, waiting in line for their next check and not wanting to go find work.

i am for the establishment of eligibility requirements to receive federal aid, to reign in the abuse and waste. for example, food stamps should be non-transferable, and only permitted on the same items as programs like WIC, basic healthy staples. drug screening should be there too, u want federal money, clean up your act. (or is that too hard? too much to ask?)

See thats my whole point nobody is for freeloaders (except freeloaders). When I speak of people I dont speak of any of that shit. Just hard working people. WIC is a perfect example of a great benefit. It can only be used on healthy stuff for babies and toddlers. I agree drug screening should be there but that doesnt mean I dont agree assistance should be denied. I think the children may need to be removed in some cases and whom ever is taking care of them should get the assistance. My first thought is on the kids all the kids in the world should be able to eat.

i agree on the kids too, because they can't help themselves, but man something has to change it seems problems are just growing out of control, the government isn't a substitute parent, folks need to stop making babies they can't afford.

13 years ago  #788
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Since when do you talk like this? Yeah I's be libin it up like aum bich. Mack these hoes and shit!

GTFOH with that BS Hokkkie. You dont know me Im a grown ass man who works and pays bills and spend spend spend on my step daughters tuition in college. Do I buy myself things? Yeah. Why? Because I always have to look good, not only is it my job but its an investment. If I look good I get paid to make others look good. You Judgemental MF!

that's all good stuff man, I respect hard work. do you believe in the solvency of social security as it is today, with a declining workforce?

With a declining workforce I dont see how SS should be messed with at all by the govt. Because SS is one true entitlement that working Americans deserve. If anything more money should be put in to SS which brings in the question of more taxes on the rich and less on the middle class. I dont have problem with a flat tax up to a certain income. Over $250k for an individual should be taxed more.

Click me for music!
13 years ago  #789
Level 31
Status: offline
Gang: MeMyselfnI
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 9 days
Posts: 7,235

Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

definitely not doubting that there isn't good people out there, that legitimately need help. also not doubting that shit is tough for a lot of people. i think we agree that we both dislike the folks who freeload off the system. I work daily with folks who are working hard to get by, doing whatever they can do make ends meet for their family. but that's just the point, they are working hard to make ends meet and provide for their family. my only beef is with those not working hard, waiting in line for their next check and not wanting to go find work.

i am for the establishment of eligibility requirements to receive federal aid, to reign in the abuse and waste. for example, food stamps should be non-transferable, and only permitted on the same items as programs like WIC, basic healthy staples. drug screening should be there too, u want federal money, clean up your act. (or is that too hard? too much to ask?)

See thats my whole point nobody is for freeloaders (except freeloaders). When I speak of people I dont speak of any of that shit. Just hard working people. WIC is a perfect example of a great benefit. It can only be used on healthy stuff for babies and toddlers. I agree drug screening should be there but that doesnt mean I dont agree assistance should be denied. I think the children may need to be removed in some cases and whom ever is taking care of them should get the assistance. My first thought is on the kids all the kids in the world should be able to eat.

i agree on the kids too, because they can't help themselves, but man something has to change it seems problems are just growing out of control, the government isn't a substitute parent, folks need to stop making babies they can't afford.

its not a comedy..its a prophecy

13 years ago  #790
Level 35
Status: offline
Gang: LIVE WIRE
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 9 months
Posts: 11,000

Originally posted by nickrox
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by hokiefan
Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

nah man he gonna spend spend spend and live up the life now, then get to 62 and retire and then bitch about how he isn't getting enough from SS to survive and how he paid into the system and now he's not getting his fair share.

edit: this is all assuming social security is still around by then, you know they have that lockbox and all.

Originally posted by shawshank
Originally posted by wormdogg10
Originally posted by shawshank I have no problem w/ people who paid into the system getting something out...as far as your mom or even me or you..their should be a gradual rise in age for receiving ss..grandfather older folks,middle agefolks..but lifespan has increased since ss inception..maybe 68..and tax 100% of earned income,why stop at 120k or whatever it is..and allow investment options.

American life expectancy is avg. 77 yrs old (less for men more for woman) So we should only be able to enjoy retirement for 9 yrs? I worked all my life to relax for 9 yrs?

c'mon worm,ik you have somewhat of a clue..social security was never designed as someones sole retirement savings plan,unfortubately some and maybe yourself see it as that....if you"ve worked "your whole life" and are only relying on ss income then that a problem on your part..if you think i'm working till 62-65 or 67 then thats just crazy..save,401ks,ira's or a multitude of other retirement plans are avaible to 100% of the country,put in a little or put in alot,and before you blow up and say most people have nothing to put in,look around,saving for retirement is hard and takes sacrafice..even the little things like a pack of smokes or a coffee at dd....now this is off thread topic,but i feel sorry for the hard working folks that rely solely on ss.....i'll be "relaxing" at 55...because i sacrificed and planned accordingly.

Im not just talking about the money from SS im talking about the retirement age and the benefits that come with it. Like moving to a retirement community or insurance advantages etc. However there are some who cant afford to that extra money out of their checks for 401ks, and ira's or cd's. Some people have to prepare accordingly just to make sure that everyone in the house eats everyday. See the problem is you(conservatives) think everyone is or should be just like you no matter what. And that people who need support are just living it up like fat cats off of our tax dollars. Some times it takes stepping outside of your bubble to get a different perspective.

Take a few minutes and give this show a little of your time. This is just one out of the 3 seasons its been on. its an eye opener for sure.

definitely not doubting that there isn't good people out there, that legitimately need help. also not doubting that shit is tough for a lot of people. i think we agree that we both dislike the folks who freeload off the system. I work daily with folks who are working hard to get by, doing whatever they can do make ends meet for their family. but that's just the point, they are working hard to make ends meet and provide for their family. my only beef is with those not working hard, waiting in line for their next check and not wanting to go find work.

i am for the establishment of eligibility requirements to receive federal aid, to reign in the abuse and waste. for example, food stamps should be non-transferable, and only permitted on the same items as programs like WIC, basic healthy staples. drug screening should be there too, u want federal money, clean up your act. (or is that too hard? too much to ask?)

See thats my whole point nobody is for freeloaders (except freeloaders). When I speak of people I dont speak of any of that shit. Just hard working people. WIC is a perfect example of a great benefit. It can only be used on healthy stuff for babies and toddlers. I agree drug screening should be there but that doesnt mean I dont agree assistance should be denied. I think the children may need to be removed in some cases and whom ever is taking care of them should get the assistance. My first thought is on the kids all the kids in the world should be able to eat.

i agree on the kids too, because they can't help themselves, but man something has to change it seems problems are just growing out of control, the government isn't a substitute parent, folks need to stop making babies they can't afford.

its not a comedy..its a prophecy

If thats the case we've already been there and just celebrated the 10th anniversary of the biggest lie in the history of America brought on by a C student!

Click me for music!

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread