Tri State Brawlers
JimmyTh...dam son - wat's it every thread u callin me out... wen mayweather fights 12 rounds u can talk to me - on to the next one - mayweather cant back down now. - better do the 50-50 for the fight - accept that shit quick and fuckin get ready - pac looked like shit tonite tho - couldnt get off his back hand enough
He cancelled the may 5th date, not Mayweather. Im not beat, Jimmy. I know you see it. He's been exposed.
just like mayweather was exposed b4 he took cheap shots to knock out ortiz cuz he knew he couldnt go a full fight wit em
the diff between mayweather and marquez - is marquez knows pacman - fought him twice b4 - he was soft wen he fought mayweather at the heavier weight - the commentators were talkin bout it, he was solid and kept his speed and sharpness and carried the weight well.. was a good fight. mayweather dont want it - but after watchin that fight if he dont make a fight happen we know it's him - pacman said he's down to fight whoever
so you saying mayweather should fight marquez again? cause pac lost that fight, brah.
he should step up and fight pacman - marquez only fought well cuz he knows pac - he knows how he fight... it was close - i had the fight at a draw - as did ur boy dan rafael from espn - that u praised after mayweather fight
]
i watched the pacman marquez fight a 2nd time and actually did the fight cards - got it 114-114
Last edited by JimmyTheButcher 14 years ago
dam son - wat's it every thread u callin me out... wen mayweather fights 12 rounds u can talk to me - on to the next one - mayweather cant back down now. - better do the 50-50 for the fight - accept that shit quick and fuckin get ready - pac looked like shit tonite tho - couldnt get off his back hand enough
He cancelled the may 5th date, not Mayweather. Im not beat, Jimmy. I know you see it. He's been exposed.
just like mayweather was exposed b4 he took cheap shots to knock out ortiz cuz he knew he couldnt go a full fight wit em
the diff between mayweather and marquez - is marquez knows pacman - fought him twice b4 - he was soft wen he fought mayweather at the heavier weight - the commentators were talkin bout it, he was solid and kept his speed and sharpness and carried the weight well.. was a good fight. mayweather dont want it - but after watchin that fight if he dont make a fight happen we know it's him - pacman said he's down to fight whoever
so you saying mayweather should fight marquez again? cause pac lost that fight, brah.
he should step up and fight pacman - marquez only fought well cuz he knows pac - he knows how he fight... it was close - i had the fight at a draw - as did ur boy dan rafael from espn - that u praised after mayweather fight
]
i watched the pacman marquez fight a 2nd time and actually did the fight cards - got it 114-114
so you dont think if pac fights the same way, he'll lose? mayweather is a lot sharper than Marquez. I praised?
Last edited by Slickster 14 years ago
JimmyTh...
Pac has had 2 back to back lackluster performances. can you at least admit that? He lost last night, brah. he won off of influence, not on points. And I praised who?
JimmyTh...
Pac has had 2 back to back lackluster performances. can you at least admit that? He lost last night, brah. he won off of influence, not on points. And I praised who?
the guy who said mayweather won clean cuz ortiz dropped his guard - dan rafael from espn. i remember specifically that was ur argument against me wen i called the shot cheap. u brought up the espn guy and said i should read his article. - so since u praised him then... i figured u should check out his article on the pac fight

Pac has had 2 back to back lackluster performances. can you at least admit that? He lost last night, brah. he won off of influence, not on points. And I praised who?
the guy who said mayweather won clean cuz ortiz dropped his guard - dan rafael from espn. i remember specifically that was ur argument against me wen i called the shot cheap. u brought up the espn guy and said i should read his article. - so since u praised him then... i figured u should check out his article on the pac fight
I dont recall. I do remember saying that he shouldve protected himself, so maybe we agreed. but still, do you think Pac is gonna win like that?
JimmyTh...
Pac has had 2 back to back lackluster performances. can you at least admit that? He lost last night, brah. he won off of influence, not on points. And I praised who?
the guy who said mayweather won clean cuz ortiz dropped his guard - dan rafael from espn. i remember specifically that was ur argument against me wen i called the shot cheap. u brought up the espn guy and said i should read his article. - so since u praised him then... i figured u should check out his article on the pac fight
I dont recall. I do remember saying that he shouldve protected himself, so maybe we agreed. but still, do you think Pac is gonna win like that?
of course not - but mayweather doesnt brawl like that and wen he does he is usually on the losing side. like the 2nd round wen he fought mosley - he tried to go toe to toe and almost got knocked out

Pac has had 2 back to back lackluster performances. can you at least admit that? He lost last night, brah. he won off of influence, not on points. And I praised who?
the guy who said mayweather won clean cuz ortiz dropped his guard - dan rafael from espn. i remember specifically that was ur argument against me wen i called the shot cheap. u brought up the espn guy and said i should read his article. - so since u praised him then... i figured u should check out his article on the pac fight
I dont recall. I do remember saying that he shouldve protected himself, so maybe we agreed. but still, do you think Pac is gonna win like that?
of course not - but mayweather doesnt brawl like that and wen he does he is usually on the losing side.
LOSING? HE'S UNDEFEATED! Mayweather is smart, Pac was barely able to hit Maquez. He was off balance and getting countered all night. what do you think he's gonna do with Mayweather?
wormdogg10

First


