OBAMA's 2nd TERM Discussion Thread
wormdogg10He said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Nothing about AND I QUOTE " killing american citizens with drones who may be involved in terrorist activities"! He said more then once OBAMA WANTS TO KILL AMERICANS WITH DRONES! Nothing about terrorists, nothing about the answer was NO to the question Paul asked. So that means his and fauxnews's coverage and false and UNTRUE as I stated! Now how is it not untrue without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?
Anwar al-Aulaqi, a US citizen was killed as a target in a drone strike, yet obama was against water boarding, that is how this statement is true
how can you be against water boarding but for killing someone?
Last edited by Sun_Tzu 13 years ago
"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something."
~ Plato
i really dont think its such a bad thing either way...it wasnt too long ago that dude was in a bunker with that kid for 5 days..had that kid not been in the bunker..fly a drone up his ass for all i care.. rather than sending in people
wormdogg10the Constitution means nothing to this president.
Again just ignorant of you and fauxnews to spread untruths to the american people.
how is that statement untrue?
Anwar al-Aulaqi, a US citizen was killed as a target in a drone strike, yet obama was against water boarding, that is how this statement is true
how can you be against water boarding but for killing someone?
So he was an american terrorist correct? But that is not what Hokie said!!!!! At all!
i think its a lot more destructive and cruel to kill someone than to water board them
He said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Nothing about AND I QUOTE " killing american citizens with drones who may be involved in terrorist activities"! He said more then once OBAMA WANTS TO KILL AMERICANS WITH DRONES! Nothing about terrorists, nothing about the answer was NO to the question Paul asked. So that means his and fauxnews's coverage and false and UNTRUE as I stated! Now how is it not untrue without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?
So again with the highlighted statement hokie said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Now this was not his first time stating this and nowhere does he say anything about terrorists or specific people. HE SAID "KILL an AMERICAN" several times just as fauxnews has. So as previously stated "without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?" How is that a true statement?
the Constitution means nothing to this president.
Again just ignorant of you and fauxnews to spread untruths to the american people.
how is that statement untrue?
Anwar al-Aulaqi, a US citizen was killed as a target in a drone strike, yet obama was against water boarding, that is how this statement is true
how can you be against water boarding but for killing someone?
So he was an american terrorist correct? But that is not what Hokie said!!!!! At all!
i think its a lot more destructive and cruel to kill someone than to water board them
He said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Nothing about AND I QUOTE " killing american citizens with drones who may be involved in terrorist activities"! He said more then once OBAMA WANTS TO KILL AMERICANS WITH DRONES! Nothing about terrorists, nothing about the answer was NO to the question Paul asked. So that means his and fauxnews's coverage and false and UNTRUE as I stated! Now how is it not untrue without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?
So again with the highlighted statement hokie said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Now this was not his first time stating this and nowhere does he say anything about terrorists or specific people. HE SAID "KILL an AMERICAN" several times just as fauxnews has. So as previously stated "without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?" How is that a true statement?
so it is ok to kill an american with a drone, but not ok to water board a terrorist
i understand ya now
Last edited by Sun_Tzu 13 years ago
"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something."
~ Plato
wormdogg10Exactly and wouldve saved that states people in taxes paying for all that over time if he wasnt underground one click of a keyboard and the kid would be home free. But according to Holders first statement it wouldnt even be used in such instances. Only in drastic issues where the police or national guard etc. couldnt handle a situation such as 9/11. Speaking of 9/11 Obama's administration just caught Al Qaedas #2 guy (amongst the many already) down goes another one.
wormdogg10the Constitution means nothing to this president.
Again just ignorant of you and fauxnews to spread untruths to the american people.
how is that statement untrue?
Anwar al-Aulaqi, a US citizen was killed as a target in a drone strike, yet obama was against water boarding, that is how this statement is true
how can you be against water boarding but for killing someone?
So he was an american terrorist correct? But that is not what Hokie said!!!!! At all!
i think its a lot more destructive and cruel to kill someone than to water board them
He said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Nothing about AND I QUOTE " killing american citizens with drones who may be involved in terrorist activities"! He said more then once OBAMA WANTS TO KILL AMERICANS WITH DRONES! Nothing about terrorists, nothing about the answer was NO to the question Paul asked. So that means his and fauxnews's coverage and false and UNTRUE as I stated! Now how is it not untrue without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?
So again with the highlighted statement hokie said AND I QUOTE "but now it is acceptable to use a DRONE to KILL an AMERICAN." Now this was not his first time stating this and nowhere does he say anything about terrorists or specific people. HE SAID "KILL an AMERICAN" several times just as fauxnews has. So as previously stated "without you adding to what you "perceived" he meant but what he actually said several times?" How is that a true statement?
so it is ok to kill an american with a drone, but not ok to water board a terrorist
i understand ya now
Terrorist yessir! Gettem all! Do you plan on signing up with Al Qaeda? Or is it you find it ok to plot against you as citizen by a home grown terrorist with no repurcussions. Whether drone or by man does it matter? The fact is that drones in the US were never meant for such matters and were approved and voted for by your rethuglican Congress. The whole killing Americans thing started with the whole "Obamas taking your guns" fears! It was ok then but now since the thousands (more) of militia groups which sprouted since Obama's 2nd term started these rumors, now we're all going to be killed by the " Attack of the Drones". So once again if it sucks for you thank your local rethuglican.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/7/coming-to-a-sky-near-you/
wormdogg10
hokiefanYessa Massa Hokie! We sa here Negroes aints gotssa gets up and does no work sa! We's all aints gots no jobs massa Hokie.
GTFOH with that shit. Thats that racist the block is always talking about. Claiming you arent but try to stick those slick ass comments in. Like everybody on here is on welfare or doesnt have a job. Fuck you and that horse you rode in on both wearing hooded masks. Dickhead
so you are making the assumption that white people aren't on welfare and have a job, you sir are the one that is trying to find the racism that doesn't exist, in everything i say.
KROWNVICJobs are up over 250k added in feb alone
Unemployment down to lowest since 2008
]
You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those that can do nothing for him!

First

