Item Title

Item Description

**The OFFICIAL Fight Club Thread**

14 years ago  #61
Level 38
Status: offline
Gang: Freedom Fighters
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 8 months
Posts: 1,388

Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz Fight one winner: hoffa

Fight two winner: biscutz

Fight three winner: biscutz

hope this is the way you wanted it to be done hanako

was the 3rd fight a mug fight? cause i think it goes like dis if im not mistaken.....hoffa attacks once then u attack after so dats 2 fights if u win both then its no need for a 3rd fight which would have been a mug off to c who ends up in da infirmary 1st.....its the best out of 3 but the first 2 fights should be attacks where u attack once n the next person attack after...if u win both then thats it u won n no need to do a mug fest......i think dats wat she is tryin to say

A fight round consists of 3 battles... the reason for three is for each person to attack once (so as to share exp burden) and then a decider match. If one person wins both of the first two matches, no need for a third. Should a decider match be required... the person with the lowest speed will go first.

thats what we did

14 years ago  #62
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 6 months
Posts: 4,244

Originally posted by biscutz
Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz Fight one winner: hoffa

Fight two winner: biscutz

Fight three winner: biscutz

hope this is the way you wanted it to be done hanako

was the 3rd fight a mug fight? cause i think it goes like dis if im not mistaken.....hoffa attacks once then u attack after so dats 2 fights if u win both then its no need for a 3rd fight which would have been a mug off to c who ends up in da infirmary 1st.....its the best out of 3 but the first 2 fights should be attacks where u attack once n the next person attack after...if u win both then thats it u won n no need to do a mug fest......i think dats wat she is tryin to say

A fight round consists of 3 battles... the reason for three is for each person to attack once (so as to share exp burden) and then a decider match. If one person wins both of the first two matches, no need for a third. Should a decider match be required... the person with the lowest speed will go first.

thats what we did

so im guessing the 3rd match (deciding match if there's a tie) should be a mug off ONLY FOR DEFENSIVE PLAYERS since speed vs speed never results in a tie......but i have seen speed trainers tie with defensive trainers....confusing to me

14 years ago  #63
Level 38
Status: offline
Gang: Freedom Fighters
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 8 months
Posts: 1,388

Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz
Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz Fight one winner: hoffa

Fight two winner: biscutz

Fight three winner: biscutz

hope this is the way you wanted it to be done hanako

was the 3rd fight a mug fight? cause i think it goes like dis if im not mistaken.....hoffa attacks once then u attack after so dats 2 fights if u win both then its no need for a 3rd fight which would have been a mug off to c who ends up in da infirmary 1st.....its the best out of 3 but the first 2 fights should be attacks where u attack once n the next person attack after...if u win both then thats it u won n no need to do a mug fest......i think dats wat she is tryin to say

A fight round consists of 3 battles... the reason for three is for each person to attack once (so as to share exp burden) and then a decider match. If one person wins both of the first two matches, no need for a third. Should a decider match be required... the person with the lowest speed will go first.

thats what we did

so im guessing the 3rd match (deciding match if there's a tie) should be a mug off ONLY FOR DEFENSIVE PLAYERS since speed vs speed never results in a tie......but i have seen speed trainers tie with defensive trainers....confusing to me

yeah think thats right m8 for only if there both def trainers they go to a mug of ,think this weeks fights will sort everything out for next week

14 years ago  #64
Level 38
Status: offline
Gang: Freedom Fighters
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 8 months
Posts: 1,388

Fight one winner: biscutz

Fight two winner: biscutz

against odog

14 years ago  #65
Banned
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 15 years, 6 months
Posts: 4,494

Originally posted by biscutz Fight one winner: biscutz

Fight two winner: biscutz

against odog

Biscutz is beasting

14 years ago  #66
Level 22
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 12 days
Posts: 1,136

Nate1979 vs Wormdogg10

Fight 1: Worm

Fight 2: Worm

----------------------------

Nate1979 vs Halfbaked

Fight 1: Tie

Fight 2: Tie

Fight 3: Tie

Tie breaker: Halfbaked

----------------------------

Nate1979 vs Bronson

Fight 1: Nate

Fight 2: Nate

Last edited by NATE1979 14 years ago

14 years ago  #67
Level 39
Status: offline
Gang: The V_GUNs
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 23,336

Originally posted by biscutz

hope this is the way you wanted it to be done hanako

Yes that is... thanks so much...

Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz
Originally posted by BkGangstar
Originally posted by biscutz Fight one winner: hoffa

Fight two winner: biscutz

Fight three winner: biscutz

hope this is the way you wanted it to be done hanako

was the 3rd fight a mug fight? cause i think it goes like dis if im not mistaken.....hoffa attacks once then u attack after so dats 2 fights if u win both then its no need for a 3rd fight which would have been a mug off to c who ends up in da infirmary 1st.....its the best out of 3 but the first 2 fights should be attacks where u attack once n the next person attack after...if u win both then thats it u won n no need to do a mug fest......i think dats wat she is tryin to say

A fight round consists of 3 battles... the reason for three is for each person to attack once (so as to share exp burden) and then a decider match. If one person wins both of the first two matches, no need for a third. Should a decider match be required... the person with the lowest speed will go first.

thats what we did

so im guessing the 3rd match (deciding match if there's a tie) should be a mug off ONLY FOR DEFENSIVE PLAYERS since speed vs speed never results in a tie......but i have seen speed trainers tie with defensive trainers....confusing to me

Yes i think that after this first round we will need to discuss ties a little more... but lets get through a round and then evaluate how it goes and then discuss more what to do with ties...

14 years ago  #68
Level 39
Status: offline
Gang: The V_GUNs
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 23,336

Originally posted by Bready can i join this looks fun

I will put your down for next round... if i can combine you with some butter to make a pudding lmaoooooo ... ... but seriously... i will put you down for next round... so get training for now

14 years ago  #69
Level 39
Status: offline
Gang: The V_GUNs
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 16 years, 4 months
Posts: 23,336

Pool I

CashMoney123

nvrbackdown

drewdrake2

TheGrimRaper

Welshkiller

Seanbricks

Cash vs nvr

cash vs drew

cash vs raper

cash vs welshkiller

cash vs sean

nvr vs drew

nvr vs raper

nvr vs welshkiller

nvr vs sean

drw vs raper

drw vs welshkiller

drw vs sean

raper vs welshkiller

raper vs sean

welshkiller vs sean

Pool H

Lalapoo

Brock786

OG4lyfe

RR123

Melyssa

Lala vs brock

lala vs og

lala vs rr

lala vs mel

brock vs og

brock vs rr

brock vs mel

og vs rr

og vs me

rr vs mel

Pool G

Hoffa

Bulldozer

Biscutz

rogerharkey

odog219

hoffa vs bull

hoffa vs biscutz winner Biscutz

hoffa vs roger winner Hoffa

hoffa vs od

bull vs biscutz

bull vs roger

bull vs od

biscutz vs roger

biscutz vs od winner Biscutz

rog vs od OD

Pool F

mike1

TItus

Gabots

Jimwhitbread

Mike vs titus

mike vs gabots winner Gabots

mike vs jim

tit vs gabots

tit vs jim

gabots vs jim

Pool E

BLB

hokiefan

Cutie

bigb2146

BLB vs Hokiefan

BLB vs Cutie

BLB vs bigb

hokiefan vs Cutie

Hokiefan vs bigb winner Hokiefan

cutie vs bigb

Pool D

Bronson2010 0 - 0- 0

Nate1979 1 - 0 - 0

Worm 1 - 1 - 0

halfbaked 1 - 1 - 1

Top of Pool Halfbaked

Bottom of Pool Bronson

Match outcomes

Nate vs bron winner Nate

nate vs hb winner Halfbaked

nate vs worm winner Worm

brn vs hb winner Halfbaked

bron vs worm winner Worm

hb vs worm winner Halfbaked

Pool C

Nickrox

Dayna

Deadheaed86

4bent134bompton

Nick vs Dayna

Nick vs Dh

Nick vs 4bent

dayna vs dh

dayna vs 4bent

Dh vs 4bent

Pool B

Howie429

Dem

Hanako

neo88

Howie vs dem

howie vs hanako

howie vs Neo

Dem vs Hanako

Dem vs Neo

Hanako vs Neo

Pool A

911

BkGangstar

Woods

Bluesky

911 vs bk

911 vs woods

911 vs blue

bk vs woods

bk vs blue

woods vs blue

14 years ago  #70
Level 21
Status: offline
Prison: South Dakota
Incarcerated: 14 years, 8 months
Posts: 2,989

RR123 vs. Melyssa

Fight one winner: RR123

Fight two winner: Melyssa

Fight three winner: RR123

AZ peoples mail me, lets get this sorted out

 

Quick Reply

You are unable to reply to this thread