OBAMA OR ROMNEY
hokiefanHe had 2 years with a majority on both sides. He could have been passing bills like a printing press.
AmbitousAND MOST OF THEM OLD AS SHIT WITH THAT OLD WAY OF THINKING...THEY PISSED A NIGGA IN OFFICE AS IT IS KEEP IT FUNKY MAN..YOU NOT BEING RASICT IF YOU KNOW THAT ITS JUST THE WAY IT IS.
SAY,,WHAT?
Rooster...That is one of the most ignorant comments I have ever heard, but it's circulated so well that people believe it's a decent criticism.
Anyone who's taken a class on government should understand that the president controls fuck all. You can't blame him for not doing something when he doesn't have the power to change it. Bills are created in the Senate, and without a veto (which people for some reason would call a bitch move) the President cannot put into action anything. If the Senate and House do not cooperate, he has absolutely no power. Oh, what's that, the Republicans in the Senate and House have not been cooperating? Fucking explains why he hasn't been able to do anything.
He had 2 years with a majority on both sides. He could have been passing bills like a printing press.
and he should have and not tried to reach across the isle to the haters on the right man!
Which Obama ad did you rip that off of?
I think he pulled it from the Romney ad where he said he would fight back against the production monopoly that China has over the U.S. Which is stupid, because that implies that he would either encourage slave labor in the U.S. or that he would decrease the profit margins of the companies funding him. Now, if he had to choose, I think everyone in this thread knows which he would go with.
I think he said tariffs on goods produced in china to compensate for the manipulation they do to their currency
Ok, say he puts tariffs on their products.
An item (let's call it the Goomba) costs $5 from China now. 5 cents goes to the worker, 5 cents goes into the materials required, and 50 cents goes to the factory owner. Government takes a dollar out, and the company is left with a $3.40 profit.
With a tariff, the company can either decide to take the loss in profits or raise their prices to accommodate the change. Most do the latter because of how the demand falls.
Move it to the U.S., where labor for the item costs $8, 5 cents goes into the materials, the factory owner takes 50 cents, and the government takes a dollar for tax. Current costs are $9.55. If the company wants to make the same profit, they mark it up $3.40, making the final price $12.95.
Production stays in China unless the tariff is about 150%. Then we'll be paying 250% what we originally paid for the same product.
Now, what part of that sounds good to you?
Majority is not enough to pass a bill.
2/3 majority is required, which Obama DIDN'T have.
So no, he couldn't have been passing bills left and right. That sounds like Republican propaganda aimed at those who are unfamiliar with congressional regulations.
Rooster...aint it called a fillabuster !smh
I assume you're referring to the Republican block. I'm not sure whether or not they used a filibuster, but they certainly behaved like cunts.
Rooster...ya its been around for a long time but never practiced i think but the republicans threatned it a lot !

First
